Legal Opinion
Andrianumearisata v. Department of Health and Welfare
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided December 8, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00426Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ARTEM ANDRIANUMEARISATA, Case No. 1:21-cv-00426-DCN Plaintiff, INITIAL REVIEW ORDER v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Artem Andrianumearisata’s Complaint (Dkt. 1) and Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Dkt. 2). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the Court must review Andrianumearisata’s request to determine whether he is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis—which permits civil litigants to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee or to pay the filing fee…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Herman Resnick v. Warden Hayes Lt. Ernst Officer Myers (Dho) Counselor Aune Officer WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. William F. McQuade and Wilma N. McQuadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.