Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Ellison

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1990No. 89-2167PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 6-101(A)(3) and 7-101(A)(3). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. EllisonOhio Supreme Court · 2008