Legal Opinion
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Ellison
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1990No. 89-2167PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
We agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 6-101(A)(3) and 7-101(A)(3). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Dayton Bar Ass'n v. EllisonOhio Supreme Court · 2008