Legal Opinion

Peninsular Savings Bank v. Wineman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Donovan, J. Bill of interpleader by the Peninsular Savings Bank against Nancy Wineman individually, and Nancy Wine-man and Alfred C. Wineman as executors of the last will and testament of Henry Wineman, deceased, to determine the title to certain money on deposit with complainant. From a decree in favor of the estate, Nancy Wineman appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

There is no serious dispute about the facts in this case. Mr. Henry Wineman had a deposit with the complainant bank of $4,467.46. On March 12, 1896, he directed the bank to transfer that credit to his wife, Nancy Wineman, and this was done by balancing his account, and crediting that sum to her. A pass-book was issued in her name, and delivered to him, and this he retained to the time of his death. He never afterwards had an account with complainant. On March 31, 1897, he made a deposit of $2,573.50 to her credit. Three checks were paid, two of which Mrs. Wineman signed; and one w*as paid…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Brabrook v. Boston Five Cents Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Love v. FrancisMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Holmes v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Gardner v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shepard v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Clay v. LaytonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Boyer v. BackusMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Moore v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Wipfler v. Detroit Pattern WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API