Gallaher & Speck v. Madsen
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at tlie March term, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barres
This was a claim for labor performed and material furnished at defendant’s special instance and request. The main question at issue was whether the agreement therefor was express or implied. The court, before whom the case was tried withoiit a jury, held that there was an implied agreement and rendered judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $94.89.
No propositions of law were submitted to the court, and plaintiff in error does not point out in his argument any specific rulings on evidence. Only questions of fact, therefore, remain for our consideration, and upon a review of the evidence we…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Pittman v. LemasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924