Legal Opinion

Steadman v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1976No. 9024PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

This appeal arises from a denial of appellant’s post-trial motion for judgment of acquittal or a new trial. Appellant was in- dieted for second-degree murder (D.C. Code 1973, § 22-2403) and carrying a pistol without a license (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-3204). A motion to suppress identification testimony was heard and denied. After a jury trial, appellant was found guilty of a lesser included offense, manslaughter (D.C. Code 1973, § 22-2405). Appellant contends (1)that the trial judge erred in excluding proffered testimony of three defense witnesses, and (2) that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Laumer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. State v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Khaalis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Whitaker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Calaway v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API