Legal Opinion

In Re Maynard

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2006No. 05-525PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray

¶1 Pursuant to Rule 44, M.R.App.P., the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Montana certified the following question to us:

Under Montana’s liberal construction of exemptions, is a debtor allowed, in addition to the exemptions claimed under § 25-13-609(1), MCA, an exemption pursuant to § 25-13-613(1)(b), MCA, for one gun based upon such subsection alone, or in conjunction with the definition of “militia forces” in Article VI, Section 13 of the Constitution of the State of Montana, where the debtor is not a member of the Montana National Guard, the Montana Home Guard or the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Neel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Orr v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Orozco v. DayMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Department of Revenue v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. MacDonald v. MercillMontana Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Salminen v. Morrison & FramptonMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Ditton v. Department of Justice Motor Vehicle DivisionMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Rios v. Justice CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re HolzapfelMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. B-Bar Tavern Inc. v. Prairie Mountain Bank (In re B-Bar Tavern Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API