Legal Opinion

United States v. Carl Dennis Cutting and Barry Daniel Still

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 16, 1976No. 71-2570Published

1Opinion of the Court

538 F.2d 835

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Carl Dennis CUTTING and Barry Daniel Still, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 71-2570.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

June 16, 1976.

Burton C. Jacobson (argued), Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendants-appellants.

W. Michael Mayock, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

Before CHAMBERS, KOELSCH, BROWNING, DUNIWAY, ELY, HUFSTEDLER, WRIGHT, TRASK, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges.

TRASK, Circuit Judge:

1

Cutting and Still appeal their convictions, following jury verdicts of…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API