Legal Opinion
M.C. MacHinery Systems, Inc. v. Maher Terminals, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 29, 2000Published
1Opinion of the Court
753 A.2d 617 (2000)
164 N.J. 192
M.C. MACHINERY SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MAHER TERMINALS, INC., Defendant-Respondent.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 18, 2000.
Decided June 29, 2000
Anthony J. Pruzinsky, Jersey City, for plaintiff-appellant (Hill Rivkins & Hayden, attorneys; Mr. Pruzinsky, John J. Sullivan and Laura R. Landau, of counsel; Mr. Sullivan, on the brief).
James M. Kenny, for defendant-respondent (Kenny & Stearns, attorneys; Michael C. Mule, on letter brief).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by O'HERN, J.
If a strained metaphor may be forgiven, we hesitate to…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Robert C. Herd & Co. v. Krawill MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. Ss Hong Kong Producer, Her Engines, Etc., and Universal Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Domenico De Sole v. United States of America, Chesapeake Bay Yacht Racing Association, United States Yacht Racing Union, Incorporated, Amici CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.