Legal Opinion
Regan v. Stored Value Cards, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided January 13, 2015No. Civil Action No. 1:14-CV-01187-ATPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay or Dismiss Proceedings [Doc. 7] pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16. Defendants contend that Plaintiff is bound by a contractual arbitration agreement arising from Plaintiffs use of a prepaid debit card. As material factual disputes exist regarding the formation of the contract containing the arbitration agreement, Defendants’ Motion is DENIED.
I. Legal Standard
Defendant has asked the Court to compel arbitration under Sections 3 and 4 of the FAA.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Christina Bazemore v. Jefferson Capital Systems, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Danica Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- HOBBS v. APOLLO INTERACTIVE INCDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2019
- JEFFREY REICHERT V. RAPID INVESTMENTS, INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Neal v. RowellDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.