Legal Opinion
Haider Faruk Lania v. Warden, Central Valley Annex, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 8, 2026No. 1:26-cv-03701Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HAIDER FARUK LANIA, No. 1:26-cv-03701-DC-CSK (HC) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING 14 WARDEN, CENTRAL VALLEY ORDER ANNEX, et al., 15 (Doc. No. 14) Respondents. 16 17 This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s motion for a temporary restraining order. 18 (Doc. No. 14.) For the reasons explained below, the court will deny Petitioner’s motion for a 19 temporary restraining order. 20 BACKGROUND 21 A. Factual Background 22 Petitioner Haider Faruk Lania…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Johnson v. CouturierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Leonardo v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Klein v. City of San ClementeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Sidibe v. Sutter HealthDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013