Legal Opinion

County of Burlington v. Martin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 7, 1942PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Chief Justice.

By virtue of R. S. 54:33-10 (Pamph. L. 1909, ch. 238, p. 375, as amended by Pamph. L. 1931, ch. 198, p. 497) the County of Burlington received five per centum of the transfer inheritance tax assessed against the estate of John T. Dorrance, who died on September 21st, 1930, a resident of that count). The tax, in the amount of $12, 183, 459.96, was not paid to the state until the fiscal year 1936-1937 and the accrued interest amounted to $3,437,333.49. The County of Burlington, under the statute, supra, received its proportionate share of the principal sum from the State…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Hobart v. HuffakerNevada Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. De Laney v. City and County of Denver Etal. In Re WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  2. Tobin v. Jersey Shore BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  3. Cino v. DriscollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API