Myer v. Liverpool, London & Globe Insurance
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBartol, C. J.
The appellants, citizens of Maryland, sued out of the Superior Court of Baltimore City, an attachment on warrant against Gr. W. Bittinger & Brother as non-residents of Maryland, and who were residents of Chicago; and caused the attachment to be laid in the hands of the L., L. and Gr. Insurance Company as garnishee; the same being a corporation created by the laws of Great Britain, the service of the attachment process was made upon the agent of the Company in Baltimore, and its purpose was to attach funds alleged to be due from the Insurance Company to Bittinger & Bro., for a loss which…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Morawetz v. Sun Insurance OfficeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Thomas v. Hudson Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Cole v. Randall Park Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Fico, Inc. v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Fairfax Forrest Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.