Legal Opinion

De Rosmo v. Feeney

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 30, 1941No. 1873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion for an order directing the plaintiffs to file a bond in the sum of $250 or to deposit such sum in cash with the clerk of this court as security for costs.

Defendants contend that the New York law, Section 1522 of the Civil Practice Act of the State of New York, requiring security for costs is binding upon this court. Section 1522 of the Civil Practice Act of the State of New York provides that the granting of an order for security for costs is mandatory and not discretionary.

Since the adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Karno-Smith Co. v. School Dist. of City of ScrantonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Woods v. ParsonsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1947
  3. Janssen v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941
  4. Cornacchio v. ConiglioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1947
  5. Di Filippo v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API