Legal Opinion

McQuade v. Whaley

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1867PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from, the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, ■ City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Currey, C. J.:

This action was brought on the 8th of October, 1864, to recover a lot of land in the City of San Francisco. It is averred in the complaint that in 1852 the lot was the common property of Hugh Casement and Emily, his wife, and so continued to be until the month of May, 1861, when the husband died, and that upon that event the lot became the abso*528lute property of the said Emily. That before the commencement of the action the plaintiff became the owner of the lot by conveyance from said Emily. That the defendants have unlawfully entered into and had the possession of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gee v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Bowman v. NortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Brennan v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. HargousCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Tipton v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Jerdee v. FurbushWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  4. California Bank v. SchlesingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Bartholomew v. WestUnited States Circuit Court · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API