Alfred M. Slocum Co. v. St. Clair
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 259, Oct. T., 1911, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., June T., 1908, No. 3,092, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Alfred M. Slocum Company v. William S. St. Clair. Assumpsit for printing. Before Brégy, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $731.66. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was in refusing binding instructions for defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
This action of assumpsit was brought to recover a balance due on a contract for printing 50,000 copies of a catalogue, or booklet according to certain specifications.
*100The plaintiff’s claim aggregated $3,429.26, on which the defendant has paid the plaintiff on account $3,050, to date of November 26, 1906, when the defendant mailed to the plaintiff a letter containing a schedule of the account as he claimed it should be; striking a balance of $24.91, and stated, “I hand you my check for $24.91, in full settlement for the printing for the Catalogue—there are several errors in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Washington N. Gas Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Bernstein v. HirschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Martin v. FrantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- West Point Cotton Mills v. BlytheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Krauser v. McCurdySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rothschild v. Trexler Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Lesley v. Deeter, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1921
- Wallace's Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1923