Legal Opinion
California v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 6, 1990No. Nos. 87-7230, 87-7233, 87-7265, 87-7361, 87-7362, 87-7441 and 87-7451PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners invoke our jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2342(1) and 47 U.S.C. § 402(a) to review orders of the Federal Communications Commission issued in a rulemaking proceeding known in the telecommunications industry as the Third Computer Inquiry or Computer III.1 Petitioners dispute two discrete rulings by the Commission. First, petitioners challenge the ruling that the divested Bell Operating Companies (BOCs) no longer be required to maintain corporate separation between their common carrier communications services, which are regulated under tariff pursuant…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Mozilla Corporation v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Mical Communications, Inc. v. Sprint Telemedia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- National Rural Telecom Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Iowa Utilities Board v. F.C.C.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.