Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hancock

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 2, 1815PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*222OPINION of the Court, by

Ch. J. Boyíe.

This was an action of trespass ri et armis, brought by Han-cock against Smith and Harris, for beating and wound-inga negro slave, the property of the plaintiff, whereby be afterwards died. The defendants pleaded severally not guilty, upon which issues were joined, and the de-fondant Harris offered an additional plea, in which he alleged in substance that the slave in the declaration mentioned was on the night of the day on which the trespass is supposed to have been committed, at an un-]⅞¾-⅛1 assembly of negroes at the house of John Smith, that the said…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stanley v. Sierra Nevada Silver Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1902
  2. Peay v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860
  3. Kercheval v. Triplett's HeirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1819
  4. Thompson v. YoungMississippi Supreme Court · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API