In Re James C. Pearson, Ida J. Pearson, Debtors. James C. Pearson, Ida J. Pearson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:
This ease presents an issue of first impression in this circuit: Is the United States immune from suit for money damages for violating the Bankruptcy Code’s automatic stay, 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)?
A. Bankruptcy Code section 106(c) provides that “governmental units” are *1216bound by any code provision that “contains ‘creditor’, ‘entity’, or ‘governmental unit’ ... [and by] a determination of the court of an issue arising under such a provi-sion_” 11 U.S.C. § 106(c) (emphasis added). The Code’s automatic stay provision, in turn, operates against all “entities,” 11 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hoffman v. Connecticut Department of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Small Business Administration v. Harold Rinehart Marilyn RinehartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
3Cited by33 opinions
- In Re Keith v. Pinkstaff Linda L. Pinkstaff, Debtors. Keith v. Pinkstaff Linda L. Pinkstaff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Price v. United States (In Re Price)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- University Medical Center v. Sullivan (In re University Medical Center)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In Re JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
- Davis v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.