Kent v. Bell
Michigan Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceBlack, J.
The general rule is that equity cases should be so tried that, if appealed, they may come to this Court for final disposition on a complete and comprehensive record. Culy v. Upham, 135 Mich 131 (106 Am St Rep 388); Crocker v. Crocker, 362 Mich 6; Kenny v. Village of Novi, 367 Mich 75; Lamb v. Jeffrey, 41 Mich 719. The principal reason, of course, is that we hear and determine equity cases anew. Further, and as said in Lamb v. Jeffrey at 721:
“The judge erred in this dismissal. Complainant was entitled to put in his proofs, and have the ease come up on the facts. Hewlett v. Shaw, 9 Mich 346.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Culy v. UphamMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Lamb v. JeffreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Melvin v. ReadingMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Crocker v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Kenny v. Village of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.