Legal Opinion
In re the Town of Rutland
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Motion to compel- contribution to the building of a bridge.
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
This, as stated in the title, is an application to require the authorities of the town of LeRay to join the authorities of Rutland to contribute to and with the town of Rutland one-half the expense of building a bridge across Black river at a point at and upon an alleged highway 3,440 feet down stream and southwesterly from the point where said highway crosses another highway leading to another bridge in the village of Black River.
The Black river is the boundary line between said towns. Laws of 1801, chap. 163; Laws of 1802, chap. 93; Laws of 1806, chap. 16; Laws of 1813, chap. 101.
This…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Morgan v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Palmer v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Driggs v. . PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Egerer v. New York Central & Hudson River R. R.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Miller v. GarlockNew York Supreme Court · 1850
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Town of Pelham v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951