Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Harrell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 28, 1977No. 76-670PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHEB, Judge.

On this appeal by the wife from a judgment of dissolution, we find one point to have merit. The court erred in partitioning the parties’ nursery business when there was no prayer for partition and the issue was not tried by consent. Doane v. Doane, 330 So.2d 753 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Rankin v. Rankin, 258 So.2d 489 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972).

Accordingly, the following paragraph in the court’s final judgment is hereby stricken:

“ORDERED that the nursery plants, and the equipment used in the operation thereof, be divided equally between the parties, or in the alternative be sold and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rankin v. RankinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Doane v. DoaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. SullivanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API