Commonwealth v. Epoca
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
The appellant, Christopher C. Epoca, appeals the judgment of sentence (costs of prosecution and $50 fine) for underage drinking. 1 We affirm.
The appellant raises a single issue for appellate review: “Did the Commonwealth present evidence which was seized as a result of an illegal warrantless arrest [upheld as valid by the suppression court]?”
In reviewing the ruling of a suppression court, our initial task is to determine whether the factual findings are supported by the record. In making this determination, we are to consider only the evidence of the prosecution’s witnesses…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BlasioliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. ZiegelmeierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. ScattoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. BreslinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Com. v. Williams, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.