BELL v. DEHORTA
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEITH A. BELL and BRITTANY N. BELL, _) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) VS. ) Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-46 ) Judge Stephanie L. Haines JOSHUA DEHORTA, PAVEL ) POZDNEACOV, and HAWK HAULING, ) INC. ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION Pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5) (ECF No. 38) filed by Defendants Hawk Hauling, Inc. and Pavel Pozdneacov. In their motion, Defendants Hawk Hauling, Inc. and Pozdneacov move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims against them under Rule 12(b)(5) by arguing that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- John A. McCurdy Jr., M.D. John A. McCurdy Jr., M.D., Facs, Inc. v. American Board of Plastic SurgeryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Hritz v. Woma Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Umbenhauer v. WoogCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.