Legal Opinion

Ferran v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 2, 2016No. 2D15-3764PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Stephen Matthew Ferran pleaded guilty to two counts of burglary of a conveyance and one count of possession of burglary tools. He now challenges the denial of his motion to suppress the evidence. However, although the parties appear to have agreed that the issue was preserved for appeal, there was neither a stipulation nor a determination by the trial court that the denial of the motion to suppress was dis-positive. We therefore affirm without further comment. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d 114, 119 (Fla.2000); M.N. v. State, 16 So.3d 280, 281 (Fla. 2d DCA…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leonard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. M.N. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. Sears v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Sloss v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Russ v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API