McDonald v. Elkins
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.
Although the findings in Ronald McDonald’s action are printed in the bill of exceptions, that case is not before this court except as the findings therein are essential to a clear understanding of the trial court’s decision.
Mrs. McDonald’s care at the time of the accident is not in question, and the only issues submitted to the jury were the negligence of the defendant and the damage sustained by each plaintiff.
In denying Mrs. McDonald’s motion the presiding justice finds it to be more probable than otherwise that his instructions were followed,, and affirms that there was evidence from which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. MannionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- Maravas v. American Equitable Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- James v. StaplesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
- Bernier v. NuteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dr. Pepper Company v. HeimanWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
- Leavitt v. BaconSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
- Worthen v. AbbottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939