Legal Opinion
Sockey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 6, 1984No. F-82-698PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
676 P.2d 269 (1984)
Bobby Dean SOCKEY, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.
No. F-82-698.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.
February 6, 1984.
S. Daniel George, Inc., Sallisaw, for appellant.
Michael C. Turpen, Atty. Gen., Ozella M. Willis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.
OPINION
CORNISH, Judge:
On appeal from his conviction for Unlawful Possession of the Controlled Drug Methamphetamine, appellant Bobby Dean Sockey presents but one proposition of error. Did the trial judge err in denying his motion to suppress? We hold he did not, and affirm.
The key evidence against the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Luker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
- Gentry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Pierce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
- McFatridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matthews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
- Hanover Insurance v. Honeywell, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2002
- Lowry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Lambe v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma CityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
- Lowry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986