Legal Opinion

Wellman v. Security-First Nat. Bank of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1951No. Civ. 18308PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

Demurrers, general and special, to plaintiff’s amended complaint were sustained with leave to amend. Plaintiff having failed to amend within the time allowed, the action was dismissed pursuant to the provisions of section 581 of the Code of Civil Procedure. From the judgment of dismissal plaintiff prosecutes the present appeal.

In general, the facts are that Harrison W. Wellman, father of plaintiff, died intestate on February 13, 1947, and the defendant Security-First National Bank, hereinafter referred to as the bank, was appointed administrator of the estate. At the time of the death of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Laun v. KippWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Carr v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Hays v. TempleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arthur King Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  2. Goldberg v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Williams v. Rosinsky Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Hopper v. HopperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Martin v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API