Ledford v. State

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

By two grounds of error, appellant contests the evidence supporting his conviction for felony theft. The jury found that he had committed prior felonies and assessed punishment at 99 years of confinement. We affirm the judgment.

By ground one, appellant argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury.

The elements of felony theft are that (1) a person (2) with intent to deprive the owner of property (3) appropriates property (4) without the owner’s effective consent, and (5) the value of the property was more than $750 but less than $20,000.…