Legal Opinion

Veigle v. United States

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided February 28, 1995No. 93-713-CIV-ORL-22PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1136 MEMORANDUM DECISION

CONWAY, District Judge.

A non-jury trial was held before the Court on November 14-16, 1994 and November 29, 1994. The Court, having considered the merits of the case, makes the following finding of facts and conclusions of law.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Third-Party Defendant Vernon Hysell is Third-Party Defendant Steven Mead’s (“Mead”) step-father. In March of 1991, Mead approached Vernon Hysell and suggested his father buy a one-half interest in a property owned by Mead and located on Washington Street (“Parcel 1”). Mead told his father that he had gone in with another investor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SternSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Rogers v. LoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Hull v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  4. United States v. ResslerDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1977
  5. United States v. H. Barry Ressler and Oscar M. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ariko v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Epoch Properties, Inc. v. City of PalmettoDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
  3. Stephen J. Rogers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API