Legal Opinion
Edward Barkauskas v. Michael P. Lane, James Fairman, and Neil F. Hartigan
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 1, 1991No. 90-2703PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Edward Barkauskas was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison. After exhausting his state remedies, he petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court denied it, and Barkauskas appealed. This court reversed and remanded the case to the district court “for evidentiary hearing to determine whether the state violated the Brady rule” (requiring the prosecution to disclose exculpatory materials upon request, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963)). Barkauskas v. Lane, 878 F.2d 1031,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hernando Williams v. James Chrans and Neil F. HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States ex rel. Cross v. DeRobertisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Bernard E. Laclair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Clyde Piggie v. Zettie Cotton, Cylde Piggie v. Zettie CottonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- William Smith v. Secretary of New Mexico Department of Corrections Derald Kerby, Warden, Central New Mexico Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Angela Stroe and Marin Stroe v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Young v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Young v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.