Osborne v. Mossler Acceptance Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1DissentMcCALEB, Justice
■1 concur in the ruling which reduces the interest recoverable on the reconventional demand to 8% but I am in utter disagreement with the other conclusions of the majority.
The principal question presented in this case' is whether a plaintiff, whose property has been seized under an admittedly illegal writ of executory process, may recover damages for the mental anguish, humiliation and inconvenience suffered by him as a consequence óf the unlawful act.
The Court of Appeal approved plaintiff’s recovery for attorney’s fees and'monetary losses resulting from the illegal seizure of the house…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McCoy v. Arkansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Fallin v. J. J. Stovall & Sons, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Jackson v. BouanchaudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Oxford v. ColvinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- Haas v. BuckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.