Legal Opinion

Potomac Leasing Co. v. Dasco Technology Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 2000No. 990157PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

11 This case addresses whether Utah's eight-year statute of limitations applies to the time period between a foreign judgment's entry in the rendering state and the judgment's registration in Utah under the Utah Foreign Judgment Act. The district court concluded that the statute of limitations applies and ruled that appellant Potomac Leasing Co. (Potomac) could not enforce the Texas judgment it obtained against Karren in Utah because Potomac did not file the judgment in Utah within Utah's eight-year statute of limitations. See Utah Code Ann. § 78-12-22(1) (1996). We affirm.

BAC…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McElmoyle Ex Rel. Bailey v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. Sun Oil Co. v. WortmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. World Peace Movement of America v. Newspaper Agency Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Lawrence Systems, Inc. Ex Rel. Douglas-Guardian Warehouse Corp. v. Superior Feeders, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allen F. Grazer v. Gordon A. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Corzo Trucking Corp. v. WestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Corzo Trucking Corp. v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Alpha Mortgage Fund v. DrinkardIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Harodite Industries, Inc. v. Warren Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API