Legal Opinion

State v. Klapes

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 2, 1963No. File No. MV 14-11606PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.

There is no dispute that the defendant did in fact pass a stop sign. The only question raised is whether the state, in order to prove a prima facie case, was required to establish that the stop sign had been legally erected. No evidence *24was offered as to the authority for the stop sign, and the defendant contends that without such proof there could be no conviction under § 14-301 (c) of the General Statutes.

Section 14-301 provides, in part, as follows: “The traffic authority of any town, city or borough may designate any highway or part thereof under the control of such town, city or borough…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  2. Ward v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  3. Gett v. IsaacsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Atwater v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  5. Wofsey v. New York & Stamford Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CooperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. City of Independence v. PetersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. State v. PiscopioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API