State v. Klapes
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.
There is no dispute that the defendant did in fact pass a stop sign. The only question raised is whether the state, in order to prove a prima facie case, was required to establish that the stop sign had been legally erected. No evidence *24was offered as to the authority for the stop sign, and the defendant contends that without such proof there could be no conviction under § 14-301 (c) of the General Statutes.
Section 14-301 provides, in part, as follows: “The traffic authority of any town, city or borough may designate any highway or part thereof under the control of such town, city or borough…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Ward v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Gett v. IsaacsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Atwater v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Wofsey v. New York & Stamford Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CooperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- City of Independence v. PetersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. PiscopioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976