Legal Opinion

Coleman v. United States

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided January 16, 1937No. 4329PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, District Judge.

The motion to dismiss this war risk insurance case has been considered careful-, ly on the pleadings, stipulation of counsel, oral arguments, and briefs. The question is whether the action is barred under 38 U.S.C.A. § 445, because the first claim for permanent total disability insurance was filed May 19, 1932, which was, of course, after July 3, 1931.

The perlincnt facts are that the soldier, James Tskanes, when discharged from the army on December 10, 1918, had in effect $10,000 of war risk insurance; became totally and permanently disabled from dementia praecox while…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Perry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. United States v. MichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jensen v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1937
  2. Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API