Legal Opinion

Clemens v. District Court

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 17, 1964No. 20618PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

On August 7, 1962, Samuel G. Whatley and Rose Marie Whatley commenced an action in the District Court of the City and County of Denver wherein they sought to recover damages for injuries allegedly suffered in an automobile collision in Denver on September 29, 1961. They named as defendants Barbara Bowers, owner, and Merlin G. Clemens, driver of the vehicle which collided with the Whatley vehicle.

Service of process upon the defendants was undertaken pursuant to Chapter 75, Session Laws 1961, being C.R.S. ’53, as amended, 13-8-5 to 10 inclusive, which, among other things, provides:

“13-8-5.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Arthur U. San Agustin v. Superior Court of Guam, People of Guam, Real Party in Interest, Masatomo Nadeau, Real Party in InterestSupreme Court of Guam · 2024
  2. Smith v. PutnamDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1965
  3. Isis Litigation, L.L.C. v. Svensk FilmindustriColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Finkbiner v. MullinsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1987
  5. F & S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. ChristliebSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API