Roy Horton Tomato Co. v. Home Insurance
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HENRY WOODS, District Judge.
Defendant, Home Insurance Company and/or the Home Indemnity Company, has submitted the pending motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). It maintains that this lawsuit, when pared to its essence, is nothing more than “an attempt by the Horton family to bring Eugene Horton’s workman's compensation claim to federal court.” See Brief at 1. The plaintiffs, Roy Horton Tomato Company, Inc. and Eugene Horton, deny that assertion and allege that the complaint at bar raises issues involving fraud and negligence. The Court finds that the motion should be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Giles Edward Chapman v. Michael H. Musich, Lorri Shurtleff, Joseph W. DowneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Cain v. National Union Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Johnson v. Houston General InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. TuggleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Arkansas Kraft Vendors v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gunderson v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1998
- Estate of Blakely Ex Rel. Blakely v. Asbestos Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1991