Legal Opinion

People v. Armstrong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLathinen, J.

Defendant was arrested and charged with driving while intoxicated as a felony and violating the terms of his probation. During the subsequent proceedings, County Court ordered— upon request of defense counsel and with the consent of the People—that defendant undergo a competency examination (see CPL art 730). Following the completion of one psychiatric examination in which defendant was found competent, defendant entered into a deal whereby he admitted that he violated his probation, pleaded guilty to the crime of driving while intoxicated as a felony and was sentenced to concurrent terms of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ArmlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. MulhollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. People v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. People v. HasenflueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MotzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. People v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API