Forehand v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The appellant was convicted of the unlawful possession of marijuana in the first degree. He was sentenced to four years in the penitentiary and was fined $350. He was further assessed a fine of $100 for the victims' compensation fund.
I
The appellant argues that the trial court erred in ordering that a second jury be struck from the same venire as that from which his initial jury was struck. The record reveals that, after the original jury had been selected and the opening statements had been made by counsel, a juror notified the trial court that he had just realized that he knew the appellant.…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Bowen; Concurrence · Bowen.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Ex Parte RutledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Nobis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Knop v. McCainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte LandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Snyder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Holliday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Beard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.