McCuen v. Harris
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Per curiam
The appellants, W.J. “Bill” McCuen, et al., seek an expedited hearing in conjunction with their appeal of a Pulaski Chancery Court decision enjoining Mr. McCuen, the Secretary of State, from canvasing the returns and counting the votes in the General Election to be held November 8, 1994, on proposed amendment 2. We were presented with the appellants’ motion, accompanied by an opening brief on November 3, 1994. The appellants ask us to hear the case prior to the election.
This case is not like the case of Walker v. McCuen (Case No. 94-1149) in which we granted expedited consideration on October…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Priest v. PolkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- McCuen v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Stilley v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Ward v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Stilley v. BradleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.