Legal Opinion

CAIRNS v. MCGINLEY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 2023No. 2:19-cv-05351Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANDREW CAIRNS, CIVIL ACTION Petitioner, No. 19-5351-KSM v. THOMAS MCGINLEY, et al., Respondents. MEMORANDUM MARSTON, J. October 6, 2023 Pro se prisoner Andrew Cairns previously petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (See Doc. Nos. 1, 15.) His Amended Petition included six claims of error and requested an evidentiary hearing. (See generally Doc. No. 15.) On March 10, 2022, the Honorable Richard A. Lloret, United States Magistrate Judge, submitted a Report and Recommendation…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Gray v. NetherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Lazaridis v. WehmerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Joseph Nara v. Frederick FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API