Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Schumacher

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1983No. 45566PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNYDER, Presiding Judge.

This is an action in which the plaintiffs, John and Beulah Matthews, sought dam-, ages from defendant insurance agent Larry Schumacher and MFA Mutual Insurance Company (MFA) for failure to advise the Matthews to pay the premium due on an automobile insurance policy within a ten-day extension period. The trial court granted a motion for a directed verdict in MFA’s favor at the close of all the evidence. A jury found for the plaintiffs and against defendant Larry Schumacher, and awarded them $4,556.30 in damages. Schumacher appeals. The judgment is reversed.

Respondents…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hannah v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Zeff Distributing Co. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Bildner v. GiacomaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Barnes v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zubres Radiology v. Providers Insurance ConsultantsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Heikes v. MontgomerySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Boulevard RE Holdings LLC v. Mixon Insurance Agency Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
  4. Heikes v. MontgomerySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Principal National Life Insurance Company v. RothenbergDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API