Legal Opinion

Hettrick Manufacturing Co. v. Srere

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1926No. Docket No. 76Published

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

In this ease plaintiff was granted a judgment for the full purchase price of cotton goods sold defendants but in fact never delivered. At the time of the trial the goods were in a mill warehouse at Fall River, Massachusetts. Defendants review by writ of error.

The questions may be grouped under the following claims:(1) There was no valid, binding contract of sale.(2) Plaintiff never performed, offered to perform, or was in position to perform the alleged contract of sale.(3) Plaintiff could not recover the purchase price of the goods; its proper remedy being an action for damages.

Plaintiff is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Butler v. ThomsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Roach v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Kinney v. HorwitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  5. Fairfax Textile Mills, Inc. v. FeingoldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API