Winters v. Armstrong
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
In Equity. On demurrer and exceptions. In tho first of these three actions J. H. Winters is plaintiff, and David Armstrong, receiver of the Fidelity National Bank, is defendant, and in the two others the receiver is plaintiff, and W. II. Stanage and William Wood, respectively, are defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.
These three cases, standing on exceptions to the answer of the receiver in the first, and demurrers to his replies in the second and third of tho above-entitled causes, present substantially'the same questions, and, having been heard together, will be considered and determined together. The material facts disclosed in the pleadings, and on which the legal questions arise, are the following, viz.: The Fidelity National Bank of Cincinnati was organized in Febrnarjr, 1886, with a capital stock of $1,000,000, which “its articles of association” provided might he increased, according to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Sawyer v. HoagSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Wood v. DummerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1824
- Curran v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bailey v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- Harn v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Marion Trust Co. v. BlishIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Randall v. MickleSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Marion Trust Co. v. BennettIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.