Newport Contracting & Engineering Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*586MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
The contract provision that the cost of changes as ascertained shall be added to or deducted from the contract price *587“ when approved by the Chief of the Bureau of Yards and Docks ” does not preclude a recovery in this court of items ascertained by the board as to which the chief of the bureau does not act on their merits when the same are proven or properly stipulated.
The schedule expenditures on account of steady-time men were actual costs to the contractor within the purview of the contract and 10 per cent of profits is to be added thereto.
Extra cost on account of…
2Cited by3 opinions
- W. E. Callahan Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
- Snare & Triest Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- Nugent Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924