Legal Opinion
Claim of Schneider v. Durst Manufacturing Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 13, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1023The furnishing of the truss is a payment of compensation within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (Matter of Patti v. Knickerbocker Fireproofing Co., 280 N. Y. 609; Matter of Gabrielli v. City of New York, 258 App. Div. 1015, leave to appeal denied, 282 N. Y. 809.) Decision reopening the case and order directing the carrier to provide a truss affirmed with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Sehenck, JJ.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of Patti v. Knickerbocker Fireproofing CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Claim of Gabrielli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
3Cited by2 opinions
- Claim of Usherson v. Greeley Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Claim of Ramberg v. DornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960