Otier v. Neiman

The Statute of Limitations has run against plaintiff’s claim and, therefore, it will be unnecessary for the court to pass upon the question of the validity of the transfer of the Lake Ontario Wine Company to the Neimans and the validity of the mortgage of the Rochester Trust and Safe Deposit Company so far as they affect the interest which the plaintiff had in the property under the conveyance from Charles Hutte to Joseph P. Fetzner. ■

I find nothing-, in the circumstances connected with the transfers from' Fetzner to the wine company to charge him with actual fraud and it may be mentioned '…