Legal Opinion
Duke v. Birchfield
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 27, 1963No. Civ. No. 5122PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
This is an action brought by plaintiffs, former employees of the defendant, for an alleged violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. Specifically, plaintiffs claim a violation of 29 U.S.C.A. § 207 pertaining to compensation for overtime worked in excess of forty hours per workweek. The applicable section of the Fair Labor Standards Act dealing with overtime compensation is 29 U.S.C.A. § 207. Section 207 (a) provides in substance that no employer shall employ any of his employees “who is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Oklahoma Ex Rel. Phillips v. Guy F. Atkinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LenrootSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- George P. Shultz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. National Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969