Legal Opinion
King v. Sturge
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 23, 1959No. 59-8PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
113 So.2d 257 (1959)
Arthur KING, Appellant,
v.
Raymond Wilson STURGE, Appellee.
No. 59-8.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
June 23, 1959.
Perlman, Litman & Sponder, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Hill, Welsh, Cornell, Ross & Pyszka, Miami, for appellee.
HORTON, Judge.
The appellant, a jewelry salesman, obtained an all risk policy of insurance through the appellee to cover certain jewelry owned by him. The policy of insurance indicated that the appellant was to be insured against loss during travel from Miami to Chicago, Philadelphia, New York and return. An endorsement and cover note…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rigel v. National Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Mathews v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Williamson, Et Vir v. Nurses' Mutual ProtectiveSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
3Cited by9 opinions
- Excelsior Ins. Co. v. Pomona Park Bar & Package StoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. AddisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Miller Elec. Co. v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSUR. CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Commercial Trading Co. v. Zero Food Storage, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Landress Auto Wrecking Company, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.