Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. Cos.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1DissentFine, J.
¶ 17. 0dissenting). I respectfully dissent.
¶ 18. First, this action seeks to recover on an automobile policy issued to and paid for by Scott W Shira, the adult son of the plaintiffs, Bernard J. and Maria Shira. Scott Shira's parents are not insureds under his insurance policy. According to the Majority, their entitlement to the uninsured-motorist funds generated by the policy stems from their having "filed a wrongful death action under Wis. Stat. § 895.04." Majority, ¶ 2 (footnote omitted). I do not, however, understand how this can be because the accident happened in Minnesota and Wis. Stat.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. LeitnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Chase v. American Cartage Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Wisconsin Bankers Ass'n v. Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Nancy L. Tillett, Administratrix of the Estate of Stephen M. Tillett v. J.I. Case CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.