Fox v. . Army Store
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WINBORNE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
2Concurring in part, dissenting in partDevin, J.
This is an action for damages for an injury sustained by the plaintiff through the alleged negligence of the defendant.
The evidence is substantially as follows:
The plaintiff had entered defendant's store in the city of Asheville to make a purchase, and had gone toward the rear. A salesman of the defendant discharged a shot out of a Daisy air rifle, which struck the left lens of her eyeglasses, making a hole in the same and driving splinters of glass into her eye. Plaintiff had already lost the sight of her right eye in a…
3Cases cited30 opinions
- Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Cox v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Purnell v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Shell v. . RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Cole v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Leonard v. Tatum & Dalton Transfer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Edwards v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Belk v. BoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.